4.6 Article

NEW BVIC PHOTOMETRY OF LOW-MASS PLEIADES STARS: EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF ROTATION ON BROADBAND COLORS

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 148, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/2/30

关键词

catalogs; Hertzsprung-Russell and C-M diagrams; open clusters and associations: individual (Pleiades); stars: low-mass; stars: rotation; starspots

资金

  1. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-0909667]
  2. NSF PAARE [AST-0849736]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1009810] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109612] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present new BVIC photometry for 350 Pleiades proper motion members with 9 < V less than or similar to 17. Importantly, our new catalog includes a large number of K- and early M-type stars, roughly doubling the number of low-mass stars with well-calibrated Johnson/Cousins photometry in this benchmark cluster. We combine our new photometry with existing photometry from the literature to define a purely empirical isochrone at Pleiades age (approximate to 100 Myr) extending from V = 9 to 17. We use the empirical isochrone to identify 48 new probable binaries and 14 likely nonmembers. The photometrically identified single stars are compared against their expected positions in the color-magnitude diagram (CMD). At 100 Myr, the mid K and early M stars are predicted to lie above the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) having not yet reached the ZAMS. We find in the B - V versus V CMD that mid K and early M dwarfs are instead displaced below (or blueward of) the ZAMS. Using the stars' previously reported rotation periods, we find a highly statistically significant correlation between rotation period and CMD displacement, in the sense that the more rapidly rotating stars have the largest displacements in the B - V CMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据