4.8 Article

Chemical nature of nitric oxide storage forms in rat vascular tissue

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0234600100

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL69029-01, R01 HL069029] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelial NO production results in local formation of adducts that may act as storage forms of NO. Because little is known about their chemical nature, concentrations, and possible role in vascular biology, we sought to characterize those species basally present in rat aorta, using two independent approaches. In the first approach, tissue homogenates were analyzed by using chemiluminescence-and ion-chromatography-based techniques that allow trace-level quantification of NO-related compounds in complex biological matrices. In the second approach, NO stores were characterized by their ability to release NO when illuminated with light and subsequently relax vascular smooth muscle (photorelaxation). The latter included a careful assessment of action spectra for photorelaxation, taking into account the light-scattering properties of the tissue and the storage depletion rates induced by exposure to controlled levels of light. Biochemical analyses revealed that aortic tissues contained 10 +/- 1 muM nitrite, 42 +/- 7 muM nitrate, 40 +/- 6 nM S-nitroso, and 33 +/- 6 nM N-nitroso compounds (n = 4-8). The functional data obtained suggest that the NO photolytically released in the tissue originated from species with photophysical properties similar to those reported for low-molecular-weight S-nitrosothiols, as well as from nitrite. The relative contribution of these potential NO stores to the extent of photorelaxation was consistent with their concentrations detected biochemically in vascular tissue when their photoactivity was taken into account. We conclude that intravascular nitroso species and nitrite both have the potential to release physiologically relevant quantities of NO independent of enzymatic control by NO synthase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据