4.1 Article

Spontaneous tandem-base mutations (TBM) show dramatic tissue, age, pattern and spectrum specificity

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00277-2

关键词

Big Blue (R) mouse; lacI transgene; mutation frequency; mutation pattern; mutation spectrum; mutation databases

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS33354] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To supplement a previous analysis of spontaneous tandem-base mutations (TBM) in the lacI gene of Big Blue(R) mice, 2658 additional mutants were sequenced from 13 tissues and 44 spontaneous TBM were identified (tripling the sample size). Previous findings were confirmed and generalized and several new observations were made. TBM differ from single and other double mutations in that TBM frequency varies dramatically with tissue type. In certain tissues, most notably male germ cells, no TBM are observed despite screening as many as 26 million plaque forming units. TBM are most frequent in kidney and liver (3.45 and 2 x 10(-6), respectively), accounting for 7.6 and 4.8% of all mutational events in kidney and liver, respectively. There is a trend for elevated TBM frequency in thymic lymphomas in p53-deficient mice. TBM are more frequent in old age in both liver and kidney. TBM differ from single mutations and other double mutations because they display a marked difference in pattern and dramatic tissue specificity for target sequence. Five of the 78 possible TBM outcomes comprise 79% of those observed, and mutations at GG/CC predominate. TBM in mice were compared with TBM found in human mutation databases. TBM are also rare in the human germline (one in 5133 germline mutations reported in five human mutation databases). In general, the types of somatic TBM are similar in mice and humans except for an excess of TG/CA to CA/TG TBM in humans (TBM related to ultraviolet light-induced skin cancer were excluded). TBM may be the result of unknown mechanisms that may have some similarities in mice and humans. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据