4.7 Article

Survivin, bcl-2, bax, and bcl-X gene expression in sentinel lymph nodes from melanoma patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 306-312

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.066

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose : The expression of apoptosis-related genes, such as survivin, bcl-2, bcl-X, and bax, has been evaluated by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and by immunohistochemistry in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from melanoma patients and then correlated to the outcome of patients. Patients and Methods: Thirty-six SLNs were examined. After RNA extraction, an RT-PCR followed by Southern blot hybridization was performed to detect survivin, bci-2, bcl-X, and box mRNA. bci-2, survivin, and box gene expression was evaluated, whenever possible, also by immunohistochemistry at the protein level. Results: We found a significant correlation (P < .005) between survivin expression and outcome of patients; in fact, 61.5% of patients expressing survivin gene progressed or died because of the disease, whereas 38.5% are currently disease-free. Among patients negative for survivin expression, 100% are disease-free after a median follow-up time of 52.9 months. We did not find a significant correlation between bcl-2, box, and bcl-X gene expression and outcome of patients. In fact, these genes were found equally expressed in patients with disease progression and in disease-free patients. Conclusion: Our findings show a variable expression of apoptosis-related genes in SLNs of melanoma patients; more interestingly, we found that survivin expression correlates to outcome of patients in a statistically significant way, whereas the expression of other genes, such as bcl-2, box, and bcl-X, did not seem to correlate to progression of disease. We suggest that the detection of survivin gene expression by RT-PCR in SLNs may be a useful prognostic indicator. (C) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据