4.2 Article

Four different clones of mouse anti-acetyllysine monoclonal antibodies having different recognition properties share a common immunoglobulin framework structure

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 272, 期 1-2, 页码 161-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00500-8

关键词

N epsilon-acetyllysine; monoclonal antibody; ELISA; western blotting; DNA sequence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By employing two different immunogens and two different antibody-screening strategies, we established four mouse hybridoma clones producing monoclonal antibodies against Ne-acetyllysine. Three different protocols were used in this study; i.e., mice were (1) immunized with an NE-acetyllysine-containing peptide, Gly-Lys(Ac)-epsilon-aminocaproic acid (Aca)-Cys, conjugated to KLH, and the hybridoma clones were screened for their reactivity to a histone H3 peptide containing five acetyllysines; (2) immunized as in I and screened with chemically acetylated bovine serum albumin (BSA); (3) immunized with chemically acetylated keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and screened with chemically acetylated BSA. Antibodies produced by the four different hybridomas established here all reacted with acetyllysine residues, but their reactivity was not the same when evaluated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blotting, and resonant mirror sensor analyses. Among the three protocols examined, protocol 3 was especially useful to obtain hybridomas producing anti-Nepsilon-acetyllysine antibodies that could detect not only the acetylated histones but also other acetylated. proteins. By cloning and sequencing the cDNAs encoding the variable regions of the antibodies, we found that their framework sequences were almost the same, which suggests that some framework amino acids in addition to their complementarity determining regions (CDRs) directly contribute to their recognition function. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据