4.6 Article

Airway fibrosis in a mouse model of airway inflammation

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 186, 期 2, 页码 90-100

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0041-008X(02)00025-X

关键词

air-way fibrosis; asthma; relaxin; collagen; airway reactivity; airway inflammation; lung disease

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES05707] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BALB/c mice were sensitized to ovalbumin by systemic injection and then exposed for up to 8 weeks to ovalbumin aerosols in whole body chambers. A pattern of airway inflammation, mucous cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia. and airway remodeling with submucosal fibrosis was observed as lesions evolved over time. Larger conducting airways were removed from the lung,,, by microdissection. Airway fibrosis was quantified by direct assay for collagen content, which was significantly, increased after 4 and 8 weeks of exposure to ovalbumin aerosol. Based upon PCR analysis of mRNA levels in the airways. most of the newly synthesized colla.-en was Type 1. Relaxin. administered by continuous infusion over the second half of a 4-week exposure to ovalbumin. was able to inhibit the accumulation of Collagen in the airways of exposed mice. Thus, stimulation of Collagen degradation by an activator of Collagen breakdown by matrix metalloproteinases appears to be an effective therapeutic strategy in prevention of airway fibrosis in this animal model. Whole body plethysmography of unrestrained mice indicated functional changes in airway reactivity in the lungs of exposed animals occurring in conjunction with the reported structural changes. This result indicates that the ovalbumin-exposed mouse may be a suitable model for examining structure-function relationships in the lungs of animals with a predictable time course of airway inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis and for testing potential new drugs for treatment of asthma or chronic bronchitis at a mechanistic level, (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据