4.6 Article

KEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 142, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112

关键词

catalogs; methods: data analysis; surveys; techniques: photometric

资金

  1. NASA [NNX10AG02A]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. NASA with the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory [NCC-1390]
  4. NASA [NNX10AG02A, 134272] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the photometric calibration and stellar classification methods used by the Stellar Classification Project to produce the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). The KIC is a catalog containing photometric and physical data for sources in the Kepler mission field of view; it is used by the mission to select optimal targets. Four of the visible-light (g, r, i, z) magnitudes used in the KIC are tied to Sloan Digital Sky Survey magnitudes; the fifth (D51) is an AB magnitude calibrated to be consistent with Castelli & Kurucz (CK) model atmosphere fluxes. We derived atmospheric extinction corrections from hourly observations of secondary standard fields within the Kepler field of view. For these filters and extinction estimates, repeatability of absolute photometry for stars brighter than magnitude 15 is typically 2%. We estimated stellar parameters {T(eff), log(g), log(Z), E(B-V)} using Bayesian posterior probability maximization to match observed colors to CK stellar atmosphere models. We applied Bayesian priors describing the distribution of solar-neighborhood stars in the color-magnitude diagram, in log(Z), and in height above the galactic plane. Several comparisons with samples of stars classified by other means indicate that for 4500 K <= T(eff) <= 6500 K, our classifications are reliable within about +/- 200 K and 0.4 dex in log(g) for dwarfs, with somewhat larger log(g) uncertainties for giants. It is difficult to assess the reliability of our log(Z) estimates, but there is reason to suspect that it is poor, particularly at extreme T(eff). Comparisons between the CK models and observed colors are generally satisfactory with some exceptions, notably for stars cooler than 4500 K. Of great importance for the Kepler mission, for T(eff) <= 5400 K, comparison with asteroseismic results shows that the distinction between main-sequence stars and giants is reliable with about 98% confidence. Larger errors in log(g) occur for warmer stars, for which our filter set provides inadequate gravity diagnostics. The KIC is available through the MAST data archive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据