4.6 Article

PRECISION SPECTROPHOTOMETRY AT THE LEVEL OF 0.1%

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 142, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/153

关键词

galaxies: evolution; methods: data analysis; quasars: absorption lines; quasars: emission lines; techniques: spectroscopic

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0908354]
  2. NASA [08-ADP08-0019]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. University of Chicago
  9. Fermilab
  10. Institute for Advanced Study
  11. Japan Participation Group
  12. Johns Hopkins University
  13. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  14. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  15. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  16. New Mexico State University
  17. University of Pittsburgh
  18. Princeton University
  19. United States Naval Observatory
  20. University of Washington

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate relative spectrophotometry is critical for many science applications. Small wavelength-scale residuals in the flux calibration can significantly impact the measurements of weak emission and absorption features in the spectra. Using Sloan Digital Sky Survey data, we demonstrate that the average spectra of carefully selected red-sequence galaxies can be used as a spectroscopic standard to improve the relative spectrophotometry precision to 0.1% on small wavelength scales (from a few to hundreds of Angstroms). We achieve this precision by comparing stacked spectra across tiny redshift intervals. The redshift intervals must be small enough that any systematic stellar population evolution is minimized and is less than the spectrophotometric uncertainty. This purely empirical technique does not require any theoretical knowledge of true galaxy spectra. It can be applied to all large spectroscopic galaxy redshift surveys that sample a large number of galaxies in a uniform population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据