4.6 Article

THE LUMINOSITY AND MASS FUNCTIONS OF LOW-MASS STARS IN THE GALACTIC DISK. II. THE FIELD

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 139, 期 6, 页码 2679-2699

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2679

关键词

brown dwarfs; Galaxy: stellar content; Galaxy: structure; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: late-type; stars: low-mass; stars: luminosity function, mass function

资金

  1. UW Astronomy department
  2. NSF [AST 02-05875, AST 06-07644]
  3. NASA ADP [NAG5-13111]
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. Participating Institutions
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  9. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  10. Max Planck Society
  11. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  13. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0909463] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on new measurements of the luminosity function (LF) and mass function (MF) of field low-mass dwarfs derived from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6 photometry. The analysis incorporates similar to 15 million low-mass stars (0.1 M(circle dot) < M < 0.8 M(circle dot)), spread over 8400 deg(2). Stellar distances are estimated using new photometric parallax relations, constructed from ugriz photometry of nearby low-mass stars with trigonometric parallaxes. We use a technique that simultaneously measures Galactic structure and the stellar LF from 7 < M(r) < 16. We compare the LF to previous studies and convert to an MF using the mass-luminosity relations of Delfosse et al. The system MF, measured over -1.0 < log M/M(circle dot) < -0.1, is well described by a lognormal distribution with M(circle dot) = 0.25 M(circle dot). We stress that our results should not be extrapolated to other mass regimes. Our work generally agrees with prior low-mass stellar MFs and places strong constraints on future theoretical star formation studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据