4.6 Article

Shortening of microsatellite deoxy(CA) repeats involved in GL331-induced down-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene expression

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02962-5

关键词

GL331; matrix metalloprotemase-9; microsatellite DNA shortening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrix metalloprotemase-9 (MMP-9) associates with cancer cell invasion and metastasis. CL1-5 cells, a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line, expressed an elevated level of MMP-9 and exhibited a highly invasive and metastatic ability. By Matrigel assay and gelatinase zymography, the topoisomerase 11 poison GL331 was found to dose-dependently inhibit the invasiveness and the level of secreted MMP-9 of CL1-5 cells. Northern blot analysis indicated that cellular MMP-9 rnRNA level was decreased after GL331 treatment. Furthermore, GL331-induced down-regulation of mmp-9 gene promoter was demonstrated by using a luciferase reporter gene driven by the -216 to -13 region of the mmp-9 gene promoter cloned from CL1-5 cells. By PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis, we found that GL331 caused shortening of the -216 to -13 region of the mmp-9 promoter. Direct sequencing analysis revealed that the number of d(CA) was reduced from 24 to 18 at the microsatellite d(CA) repeat region of the mmp-9 promoter. The CL1-5 cells transfected with the luciferase reporter containing 18 d(CA)s expressed only 53% of those when the reporter contained 24 d(CA)s. The promoter region of mmp-9 gene contains other positive regulatory elements, such as TRE and kappaB. We found that GL331 did not significantly influence the luciferase activity driven by TRE or kappaB. Taken together, these data suggested that GL331 inhibited MMP-9 mRNA expression at least partly through the selective induction of shortening of microsatellite d(CA) repeats. This is the first report that an anti-cancer agent can inhibit mmp-9 gene expression by inducing microsatellite DNA shortening. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据