4.6 Article

ROTATION AND MAGNETIC ACTIVITY IN A SAMPLE OF M-DWARFS

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 139, 期 2, 页码 504-518

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/504

关键词

stars: activity; stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs; stars: rotation

资金

  1. NSF [AST 05-02413, AST-0606748]
  2. Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0909463] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have analyzed the rotational broadening and chromospheric activity in a sample of 123 M-dwarfs, using spectra taken at the W. M. Keck Observatory as part of the California Planet Search program. We find that only seven of these stars are rotating more rapidly than our detection threshold of v sin i approximate to 2.5 km s(-1). Rotation appears to be more common in stars later than M3 than in the M0-M2.5 mass range: we estimate that less than 10% of early-M stars are detectably rotating, whereas roughly a third of those later than M4 show signs of rotation. These findings lend support to the view that rotational braking becomes less effective in fully convective stars. By measuring the equivalent widths of the Ca II H and K lines for the stars in our sample, and converting these to approximate LCa/L-bol measurements, we also provide constraints on the connection between rotation and magnetic activity. Measurable rotation is a sufficient, but not necessary condition for activity in our sample: all the detectable rotators show strong Ca II emission, but so too do a small number of non-rotating stars, which we presume may lie at high inclination angles relative to our line of sight. Our data are consistent with a saturation-type rotation-activity relationship, with activity roughly independent of rotation above a threshold velocity of less than 6 km s(-1). We also find weak evidence for a gap in LCa/L-bol between a highly active population of stars, which typically are detected as rotators, and another much less active group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据