4.4 Article

Differential recognition of the free versus bound retinol by human microsomal retinol/sterol dehydrogenases: Characterization of the Holo-CRBP dehydrogenase activity of RoDH-4

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 776-784

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi026836r

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-traps-retinol is the precursor for all-traps-retinoic acid, the activating ligand for nuclear transcription factors retinoic acid receptors. In the cytosol of various cells, most retinol exists in a bound form, complexed with cellular retinol binding protein type I (holo-CRBP). Whether retinoic acid is produced from the free or bound form of retinol is not yet clear. Here, we present evidence that holo-CRBP is recognized as substrate by human microsomal short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) RoDH-4 with the K-m value close to the liver concentration of holo-CRBP. The ability to utilize bolo-CRBP differentiates RoDH-4 from a related enzyme, RoDH-like 3alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3alpha-HSD), which is 3-fold more active with free retinol than RoDH-4 but is 15-fold less active toward holo-CRBP. Recognition of the cytosolic holo-CRBP as substrate is consistent with RoDH-4 orientation in the membrane. As established by immunoprecipitation and glycosylation scanning, RoDH-4 faces the cytosolic side of the membrane. Purified RoDH-4, stabilized by reconstitution into proteoliposomes, exhibits the apparent K-m, values for substrates and NAD(+) similar to those of the microsomal enzyme and oxidizes holo-CRBP with the catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K-m) of 59 min(-1) mM(-1). Apo-CRBP acts as a strong competitive inhibitor of bolo-CRBP oxidation with an apparent K-i value of 0.2 muM. The results of this study suggest that the human retinol-active SDRs are not functionally equivalent and that, in contrast to RoDH-like 3alpha-HSD, RoDH-4 can access the bound form of retinol for retinoic acid production and is regulated by the apo-/holo-CRBP ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据