4.3 Article

Control of immunoglobulin isotype production by porcine B-cells cultured with cytokines

期刊

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 91, 期 2, 页码 141-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00293-3

关键词

immunoglobulin; cytokines; B-cells; isotype bias; pigs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytokines regulate immunoglobulin (Ig) isotype production following the Th1/Th2 paradigm, derived from studies of inbred mice. In pigs, it is not known which, if any, Ig isotypes may reflect a Th1/Th2 response. To evaluate this, purified porcine CD21(+) B-cells were co-cultured with Staphylococcus aureus Cowan strain 1 or Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide as B-cell mitogens together with recombinant human IL-2, and recombinant porcine (rp) interferon (IFN)-gamma, IL-12 or IL-10. While the mitogens increased B-cell proliferation, cytokines had no additional effect. A quantitative competitive enzyme-immuno assay was used to measure concentrations of porcine IgM, IgG(1) and IgG(2) in B-cell culture supernatants. In vitro, porcine B-cells produced IgG(2), 106 +/- 17.3 mug/ml; IgG(1) 107 +/- 38.3 mug/ml and IgM 25.6 +/- 8.45 mug/ml. In some individuals, Th1 cytokines such as rpIFN-gamma and IL-12, enhanced IgG(2) in the face of low concentrations of IgG(1). Furthermore, individual responses, in some cases, tended to be diametrically opposed, reminiscent of previously documented categorical immune responses in pigs such that some individuals produced high concentrations of IgG(1) in response to the various doses of rp cytokines, while others produced lower concentrations. Pigs may generate a high IgG(1):IgG(2) ratio in response to rpIL-10, and possibly to other Th2-associated cytokines. However, B-cell response to rp cytokines in vitro exhibits marked variation by pig, a feature that is likely a function of highly variable individual genotypes and their interaction with complex environments. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据