4.6 Article

THE STAR FORMATION HISTORY OF THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 138, 期 5, 页码 1243-1260

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: individual (Large Magellanic Cloud); galaxies: stellar content; Magellanic Clouds

资金

  1. NASA [HF-01160.01-A, NAS 5-26555, NNG05GE82G]
  2. National Science Foundation [AST973311, AST-0307482]
  3. David and Lucile Packard Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first ever global, spatially resolved reconstruction of the star formation history (SFH) of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), based on the application of our StarFISH analysis software to the multiband photometry of 20 million of its stars from the Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey. The general outlines of our results are consistent with previously published results: following an initial burst of star formation, there was a quiescent epoch from approximately 12 to 5 Gyr ago. Star formation then resumed and has proceeded until the current time at an average rate of roughly 0.2 M(circle dot) yr(-1), with temporal variations at the factor of 2 level. The re-ignition of star formation about 5 Gyr ago, in both the LMC and Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), is suggestive of a dramatic event at that time in the Magellanic system. Among the global variations in the recent star formation rate are peaks at roughly 2 Gyr, 500 Myr, 100 Myr, and 12 Myr. The peaks at 500 Myr and 2 Gyr are nearly coincident with similar peaks in the SFH of the SMC, suggesting a joint history for these galaxies extending back at least several Gyr. The chemical enrichment history recovered from our StarFISH analysis is in broad agreement with that inferred from the LMC's star cluster population, although our constraints on the ancient chemical enrichment history are weak. We conclude from the concordance between the star formation and chemical enrichment histories of the field and cluster populations that the field and cluster star formation modes are tightly coupled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据