4.6 Article

Sharc-II 350 mu m observations of thermal emission from warm dust in z >= 5 quasars

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 135, 期 4, 页码 1201-1206

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1201

关键词

galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : starburst; infrared : galaxies; quasars : individual (SDSS J033829.31+002156.3, SDSS J075618.14+410408.6, SDSS J092721.82+200123.7, SDSS J104845.05+463718.3); submillimeter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present observations of four z >= 5 SDSS quasars at 350 mu m with the SHARC-II bolometer camera on the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. These are among the deepest observations that have been made by SHARC-II at 350 mu m, and three quasars are detected at >= 3 sigma significance, greatly increasing the sample of 350 mu m (corresponds to rest frame wavelengths of < 60 mu m at z >= 5), detected high-redshift quasars. The derived rest frame far-infrared (FIR) emission in the three detected sources is about five to ten times stronger than that expected from the average spectral energy distribution (SED) of the local quasars given the same 1450 angstrom luminosity. Combining the previous submillimeter and millimeter observations at longer wavelengths, the temperatures of the FIR-emitting warm dust from the three quasar detections are estimated to be in the range of 39-52 K. Additionally, the FIR-to-radio SEDs of the three 350 mu m detections are consistent with the emission from typical star-forming galaxies. The FIR luminosities are similar to 10(13)L(circle dot) and the dust masses are >= 10(8)M(circle dot). These results confirm that huge amounts of warm dust can exist in the host galaxies of optically bright quasars as early as z similar to 6. The universe is so young at these epochs (similar to 1Gyr) that a rapid dust-formation mechanism is required. We estimate the size of the FIR dust-emission region to be about a few kpc, and further provide a comparison of the SEDs among different kinds of dust-emitting sources to investigate the dominant dust-heating mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据