4.5 Article

Peripheral and central arterial haemodynamic interactions are early abnormalities in young male cigarette smokers

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1827

关键词

smoking; applanation tonometry; cold pressor test; blood pressure; ventriculo-vascular interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: smoking, result in endothelial dysfunction and this affects systemic and local haemodynamics. The aim was to assess interactions of the left ventricle and arterial system of smokers at baseline and after a physiological stimulus - the cold pressor test (CPT) which causes a sympathetically driven vasoconstriction that counteracts the normal endothelial dependent vasodilatation. Materials and Methods: male smokers and controls were compared using applanation tonometry. Parameters included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, ejection duration, heart rate, aortic augmentation index (AAI), and sub-endocardial viability ratio (SEVR). The CPT was performed at 1 and 3 min following immersion of the hand in ice. Results: smokers have abnormal baseline cardiac timing (heart rate and ejection duration), systolic and diastolic blood pressures which are due to increased peripheral wave reflection (AAI) and thus affect the SEVR. Following CPT, the pressure wave differential, dP/dt, was significantly increased in smokers compared to non-smokers who had a decrease at 1 min in ice. Mean systolic and diastolic pressure was significantly increased in both groups at I and 3 min as was end systolic pressure in non-smokers. Conclusions: baseline ventriculo-vascular dynamics, are abnormal as was the evoked response to CPT. The blunted blood pressure increase of smokers compared to controls following CPT, may represent altered nitric oxide production in the macro and microcirculation through differential upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and inducible NOS respectively. The potential for therapeutic intervention and prevention of ongoing endothelial injury, requires further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据