4.6 Article

The kinematics of molecular cloud cores in the presence of driven and decaying turbulence: Comparisons with observations

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 136, 期 1, 页码 404-420

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/404

关键词

hydrodynamics; ISM : clouds; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; methods : numerical; stars : formation; turbulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigate the formation and properties of prestellar and protostellar cores using hydrodynamic self-gravitating adaptive mesh refinement simulations, comparing the cases where turbulence is continually driven and where it is allowed to decay. We model observations of these cores in the (CO)-O-18(2 -> 1), NH3( 1, 1), and N2H+(1 -> 0) lines, and from the simulated observations we measure the line widths of individual cores, the line widths of the surrounding gas, and the motions of the cores relative to one another. Some of these distributions are significantly different in the driven and decaying runs, making them potential diagnostics for determining whether the turbulence in observed star-forming clouds is driven or decaying. Comparing our simulations with observed cores in the Perseus and rho Ophiuchus clouds shows reasonably good agreement between the observed and simulated core-to-core velocity dispersions for both the driven and decaying cases. However, we find that the line widths through protostellar cores in both simulations are too large compared to the observations. The disagreement is noticeably worse for the decaying simulation, in which cores show highly supersonic infall signatures in their centers that decrease toward their edges, a pattern not seen in the observed regions. This result gives some support to the use of driven turbulence for modeling regions of star formation, but reaching a firm conclusion on the relative merits of driven or decaying turbulence will require more complete data on a larger sample of clouds as well as simulations that include magnetic fields, outflows, and thermal feedback from the protostars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据