4.6 Article

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors activate a calcium-sensitive transient receptor potential-like conductance in rat hippocampus

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 546, 期 3, 页码 655-664

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.032961

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In CA3 pyramidal neurons from organotypic slice cultures, activation of G(q)-coupled group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) induces a non-selective cationic conductance that enhances excitability. We have found that this response shares several properties with conductances that are mediated by the transient receptor potential (TRP) family of ion channels, including inhibition by La3+, 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborane (2APB), cis-N- (2-phenylcyclopentyl)azacyclotridec-1-en-2-amine (MDL 12,330A) and a doubly rectifying current-voltage relationship. Stimulation of mGluR1 and mGIuR5 converged to activate the TRP-like conductance in a synergistic manner, and activation of either subtype alone produced only a fraction of the normal response. Activation of the cationic current required elevated intracellular Ca2+. Chelating intracellular Ca2+ or blocking Ca2+ entry through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels attenuated responses to the activation of mGluRs. Conversely, raising intracellular Ca2+ potentiated mGluR activation of the TRP-like conductance. Under control conditions, blocking G protein activation using intracellular GDPbetaS with or without N-(2,6-dimethylphenylcarbamoylmethyl) triethylammoniurn chloride (QX-314) prevented mGluR-mediated activation of the TRP-like conductance. Following G protein blockade, however, the coupling between mGluRs 1 and/or 5 and the TRP-like conductance was rescued by increasing intracellular Ca2+. This suggests that a G protein-independent signalling pathway is also activated by group I mGluRs. Such a pathway may represent an alternative transduction mechanism to maintain metabotropic responses under conditions where G proteins are functionally uncoupled from their cognate receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据