4.7 Article

Neurodevelopmental vulnerability of the corpus callosum to childhood onset localization-related epilepsy

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 284-292

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00044-7

关键词

corpus callosum; quantitative MR volumetrics; epilepsy; temporal lobe epilepsy

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 03186] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS 37738] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent research has suggested that childhood onset of localization-related (focal) temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with a generalized adverse effect on cognition and brain structure, especially cerebral white matter volume. This study examined the neurodevelopmental impact of childhood onset epilepsy on corpus callosum volume and the cognitive consequences of reduced cerebral connectivity. Healthy controls (n = 15) and patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (n = 32) were matched on gender and handedness, and childhood and adult onset epilepsy groups were matched on duration of epilepsy (mean = 19 years) but varied in neurodevelopmental age at onset of recurrent seizures. Results showed that childhood onset of temporal lobe epilepsy was associated with significant volumetric reduction of the corpus callosum compared to both late onset and healthy controls, with the latter two groups not differing from one another. The volumetric loss was most evident in posterior followed by anterior corpus callosum. Volumetric reduction of the corpus callosum in temporal lobe epilepsy was of clinical significance with smaller volumes associated with poorer performance on measures of nonverbal problem solving, immediate memory, speeded complex psychomotor ability and fine motor dexterity. These findings indicate that childhood onset of temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with an adverse neurodevelopmental impact on brain connectivity which is of clinical consequence and theoretical interest. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据