4.5 Article

Towards determining the differentiation program of antigen-presenting dentritic cells by transcriptional profiling

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 82, 期 2, 页码 75-86

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1078/0171-9335-00294

关键词

dendritic cell; hematopoietic progenitor; differentiation; gene expression profiling; microarray

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendritic cells (DC) represent professional antigen-presenting cells that develop from hematopoietic progenitors through successive steps of differentiation. Employing DNA microarray technology, we analysed the specific changes in gene expression that occur when human progenitor cells differentiate into DC. CD34(+) progenitor cells were first amplified in vitro with stem cell factor (SCF), Flt3 ligand (FL), thrombopoietin and IL-6/soluble IL-6 receptor fusion protein, and cells were then induced to differentiate into DC with IL-4 and GM-CSE DC maturation was induced by TNFalpha. Progenitor cells and DC were subjected to transcriptional profiling by DNA microarrays that represent 13000 human genes. Our analysis revealed specific changes in the expression of a large number of cell surface antigens including molecules involved in antigen uptake and processing, cell migration and antigen presentation. Genes encoding such molecules were upregulated during DC differentiation as were genes encoding cytokines, cytokine receptors, chemokines and chemokine receptors. Stem cell genes and genes related to the multilineage differentiation potential and proliferative state of progenitor cells were downregulated. Our analysis also provides information on the expression profiles of transcriptional regulators such as the NF-kappaB/rel and STAT transcription factors. Interestingly, NF-kappaB/rel factors were found to be expressed in both progenitor cells and DC at similar levels and were induced by TNFalpha. In contrast, expression of STAT factors increased during DC differentiation and their expression was virtually unaffected by TNFalpha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据