4.5 Article

Bioavailability in humans of the flavanones hesperidin and narirutin after the ingestion of two doses of orange juice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 235-242

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601547

关键词

flavanone; hesperetin; naringenin; orange juice; bioavailability in humans

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Flavanones are polyphenols specific of citrus fruits, where they are present in high amounts. Although citrus fruits and juices are widely consumed in the world, little information has been published on flavanone bioavailability in humans. The aim of the present study was to determine the nature of the circulating metabolites, the plasma kinetics and the urinary excretion patterns of the flavanones, hesperidin and narirutin. Design: After an overnight fast, five healthy volunteers ingested 0.5 or 1 l of a commercial orange juice providing 444 mg/l hesperidin and 96.4 mg/l narirutin, together with a polyphenol-free breakfast. Blood was sampled at 10 different timepoints over a 24 h period. Urine was collected for 48 h, in five fractions. Results: Flavanones metabolites appeared in plasma 3 h after the juice ingestion, reached a peak between 5 and 7 h, then returned to baseline at 24 h. The peak plasma concentration of hesperetin was 0.46 +/- 0.07 mumol/l and 1.28 +/- 0.13 mumol/l after the 0.5 and 1 l intake, respectively. It was lower for naringenin: 0.20 +/- 0.04 mumol/l after the 1 l dose. The circulating forms of hesperetin were glucuronides (87%) and sulphoglucuronides (13%). For both flavanones, the urinary excretion was nearly complete 24 h after the orange juice ingestion. The relative urinary excretion was similar for hesperetin and naringenin and did not depend on the dose: values ranged from 4.1 +/- 1.2 to 7.9 +/- 1.7% of the intake. Conclusions: In case of a moderate or high consumption of orange juice, flavanones may represent an important part of the pool of total polyphenols present in plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据