4.5 Article

Familial aggregation of nutrient intake and physical activity: Results from the San Antonio Family Heart Study

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 128-135

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00255-7

关键词

diet; physical activity; heritability; family study; Mexican Americans

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR-01346, 1 P41 RR03655] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01-HL45522] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01-AR43351] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To evaluate the extent to which levels of physical activity and nutrient intake aggregate in families, and secondarily, to assess the repeatability of these behavioral measures over a 5-year period. METHODS: Measurements were obtained in a population-based sample consisting of 1364 members of 42 large Mexican American families. Nutrient intake was assessed by a food frequency questionnaire validated for use in this population. Usual level of physical activity was estimated using a 7-day recall questionnaire. RESULTS: Correlations between baseline (obtained 1992-1995) and follow-up (obtained 1996 to 2000) measures of all behaviors were highly significant (p < 0.001), ranging from 0.24 for % of calories derived from fat to 0.44 for % of calories derived from alcohol. Familial effects, estimated using variance component methods, were stronger when modeled as a genetic heritability than as a shared household effect; as a heritability they accounted for a significant portion of the total variation of all traits (9% for physical activity levels, p < 0.05; and 13-26% for nutrient intake, p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of physical activity and dietary behaviors in this population tracked over 5 years, and there was a significant degree of aggregation of these behaviors within families. Understanding the sources of these family effects may facilitate efforts to improve cardiovascular health. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据