3.8 Article

Estimation of genetic parameters for somatic cell count in the first three lactations using random regression

期刊

LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 79, 期 2-3, 页码 239-247

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00169-0

关键词

random regression; somatic cell count; genetic parameters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic parameters were estimated for log, somatic cell count (LSCC) for the first three lactations of 31 236 Holstein/Friesian cows with 308 534, 236 277 and 206 729 test day yields in parities 1, 2 and 3, respectively. An animal random regression model was employed in the analyses using Gibbs sampling with each parity regarded as different traits. Linear and quadratic functions were fitted for the animal and permanent environmental effects respectively, using orthogonal polynomials. Daily heritabilities increased with days in milk (DIM) and averaged about 0.07 in all three parities. This increase in heritabilities with DIM was due to an increase in genetic variance and decreases in both permanent and residual environmental variances with DIM. Environmental effects have a large influence on LSCC in early lactation in all three parities. Within lactation, genetic correlations were highest between adjacent DIM but decreased as DIM got further apart. However, this decrease was slowest in parity one and greatest in parity three. The lowest correlation within lactation was 0.10 between DIM 7 and 305 in parity 3. Across lactations, genetic correlations were highest between parities 2 and 3, intermediate between I and 3, and lowest between I and 2. The genetic correlations computed for completed lactations were 0.69, 0.79 and 0.98 between parities I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3, respectively. Corresponding phenotypic correlations between parities were 0.38, 0.31 and 0.52, respectively. A test day model, accounting for these variations in heritabilities and genetic correlations, should result in a more accurate evaluation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据