4.5 Article

Monitoring the progression of the atrial electrical remodeling in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - Analysis of the f-f interval during ambulatory ECG monitoring

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 133-138

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.67.133

关键词

atrial fibrillation; atrial refractoriness; electrical remodeling; Holter monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is important to clarify how electrical remodeling develops in clinical cases of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), because it has been suggested that this electrophysiological phenomenon promotes an increase in the frequency of PAF. In the present study, the f-f interval during PAF was analyzed from the ambulatory ECG recordings of 21 patients with PAF (total PAF duration >2/24 h with normal atrial size) to monitor the atrial electrophysiological changes. The patients were clinically followed-up for 6 months without any antiarrhythmic drugs. Before and after the follow-up period 24-h Holler monitoring was carried out and the duration of both the PAF and the f-f intervals during the PAF episode were evaluated. In selected cases, the atrial effective refractory period (ERP) was evaluated in an electrophysiologic study before and after the follow-up period. The total PAF duration was prolonged from 187 +/- 50 to 223 +/- 79 min (p=0.034) and the f-f interval was shortened from 0.14 +/- 0.03 to 0.12 +/- 0.02 ms (p=0.003). There was an inverse relationship between the changes in total PAF duration and f-f interval (p=0.027). The ERP was shortened from 214 +/- 15 to 194 +/- 5 ms (n=5, p=0.025) and there was a direct correlation between the changes in ERP and f-f interval (p=0.048). In clinical cases, the prolongation of the PAF was related to the shortening of the f-f interval during the PAF episodes and to the shortening of the atrial ERP. Electrical remodeling plays a role in promoting the development of the atrial fibrillation in patients with PAF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据