4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Intratumoral cisplatin/adrenaline injectable gel for the treatment of patients with cutaneous and soft tissue metastases of malignant melanoma

期刊

MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 59-66

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008390-200302000-00010

关键词

cisplatin; intratumoral chemotherapy; melanoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Local therapies have been highly effective in the treatment of melanoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of a novel intralesional chemotherapy - cisplatin/ adrenaline injectable gel - for the treatment of refractory or recurrent cutaneous and soft tissue melanoma metastases. The gel is injected directly into the lesion and delivers high concentrations of cisplatin at the injection site, where it is retained for extended periods, with little systemic exposure. A total of 28 patients with refractory or recurrent melanoma were enrolled in this open-label, multicentre study. Of these, 25 patients with 244 lesions were evaluable for efficacy. Lesions were injected with 0.5 ml (2 mg cisplatin + 0.05 mg adrenaline) of gel/cm(3) of tumour. Patients received up to six weekly treatments within an 8 week period. The objective response rate (complete responses [CRs] plus partial responses [PRs]) for all the tumours treated (1-72 per patient) was 53% (1130 out of 244; 114 CRs, 16 PRs). The response rate for the target tumours (i.e. each patient's single, most symptomatic, largest or most threatening tumour) was 44%. The median response duration for all tumours was 347 days (range 30-783 days) and median number of treatments per tumour was five (range one to twelve). Systemic toxicity was negligible; local adverse reactions such as erythema, necrosis or pain occurred frequently, but were easily managed in most cases. In conclusion, cisplatin/adrenaline injectable gel was well tolerated, easy to administer, and effective in treating metastatic melanoma confined to the skin or soft tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据