4.7 Article

Characterization of Arabidopsis plastid sigma-like transcription factors SIG1, SIG2 and SIG3

期刊

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 385-399

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022095017355

关键词

anti-sense plants; in vitro transcription; plastids; sigma-like transcription factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plastid genome is transcribed by nucleus-encoded (NEP) and plastid-encoded (PEP) RNA polymerases. PEP is a prokaryotic-type enzyme whose activity is regulated by sigma-like transcription initiation factors that are nucleus-encoded. cDNAs coding for six different potential sigma-like factors have been cloned and sequenced recently. However, functional analyses of these factors are still limited. We have used an anti-sense approach in order to study the function of SIG1, SIG2 and SIG3. Only SIG2 anti-sense plants show a visible phenotype characterized by chlorophyll deficiency. Surprisingly, this phenotype is different from the phenotype of SIG2 knockout plants in that the chlorophyll deficiency is limited to cotyledons. In later developmental stages, the SIG2 anti-sense plants can overcome SIG2 mRNA under-expression by adjusting SIG2 protein levels to that of wild-type plants, suggesting that SIG2 expression is also regulated at the post-transcriptional level. The efficient recovery of the wild-type phenotype could also be supported by partial take-over of SIG2 function by one of the six other sigma factors. A good candidate for such substitution of SIG2 function represents SIG3. SIG3 is constitutively expressed during plant development and its specificity in promoter discrimination is less pronounced than that of SIG1 and SIG2. Finally, SIG3 protein is enhanced in SIG2 anti-sense plants when compared to wild-type plants. SIG2 is present as a soluble factor while SIG3 is partly attached to the plastid membranes. We suggest that membrane localization is necessary for efficient SIG3 function. Therefore, SIG3 cannot substitute for SIG2 function in early chloroplast biogenesis, when plastid membranes are not yet made up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据