4.6 Article

Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy of the peritumoral zone in patients with cerebral glioma:: Assessment of the value of the method

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 145-153

出版社

ASSOC UNIV RADIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80038-7

关键词

brain; metabolism; brain neoplasms; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale and Objectives. The determination of tumor boundaries, especially in high-grade glioma, is critically important for the proper planning of treatment, but the standard diagnostic imaging methods do not enable precise delimitation of the extent of tumor cell infiltration into the surrounding tissue. The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of hydrogen-1 (H-1) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy for determining the extent of gliomatous infiltrate in the uncertain zone-the peritumoral area that appears unchanged on standard diagnostic MR images. Materials and Methods. The study group consisted of 64 patients with cerebral glioma scheduled for tumor resection and subsequent radiation therapy. All patients were examined prior to resection with MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. MR spectra were obtained from examination of the solid part of the tumor and from two peritumoral volumes of interest located approximately along the axis of surgical access to the tumor. MR spectra obtained from a group of 32 healthy volunteers were used as control data. Results. Analysis of the consequent voxels in the peritumoral zone revealed statistically significant differences in lipid/creatine and lactate/creatine metabolite ratios between patient subgroups with recurrent malignant lesions and without recurrent lesions. Significant differences also were found between the patient group and the control group in most metabolite ratios assessed. Conclusion. H-1 MR spectroscopic demonstration of metabolic changes in the peritumoral zone can guide treatment for cerebral glioma, enabling the physician to identify patients who have a high risk of recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据