4.4 Article

Effects of long-term treatment with candesartan on organ damages in sinoaortic denervated rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 325-331

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-200302000-00023

关键词

baroreflex sensitivity; blood pressure variability; candesartan; end-organ damage; kidney; sinoaortic denervation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study was designed to observe the effects of long-term treatment with candesartan cilexetil (candesartan) on blood pressure, (BP), blood pressure variability (BPV), baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and end-organ damage (EOD) in sinoaortic denervated (SAD) rats. Candesartan was mixed in rat chow at an estimated dose of 3 mg/kg/day. After 12 weeks of drug administration, rats were instrumented to determine BP, BPV and BRS in conscious state. Organ damage was estimated by observation of morphologic changes. When compared with sham-operated rats, SAD rats exhibited increased BPV, decreased BRS, and normal BP and plasma angiotensin II level. Left ventricular and aortic hypertrophies and renal lesion were. found in SAD rats. Candesartan significantly decreased BP and BPV, ameliorated impaired BRS, increased plasma angiotensin II level and obviously diminished the EOD in SAD rats. Multiple-regression analysis shows that decrease in left ventricular hypertrophy was mainly related to decrease in systolic BPV. Decrease in aortic hypertrophy was mainly determined by increase in BRS and decrease in systolic BP. Amelioration in renal lesion was predicted by increase in BRS and decrease in systolic BPV. BRS was the most important determinant for renal lesion and aortic hypertrophy in SAD rats. In addition, plasma angiotensin II level was higher in candesartan-treated rats. In conclusion, long-term treatment with candesartan prevented SAD-induced organ damage. Restoration of arterial baroreflex function, decrease in BPV, and blockade of activated renin-angiotensin system may contribute to the organ protective action of candesartan in SAD rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据