4.6 Article

Mantle circulation models with variational data assimilation: inferring past mantle flow and structure from plate motion histories and seismic tomography

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 152, 期 2, 页码 280-301

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01823.x

关键词

Earth's interior; geodynamics; inverse problems; mantle convection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mantle convection models require an initial condition some time in the past. Because this initial condition is unknown for Earth, we cannot infer the geological evolution of mantle flow from forward mantle convection calculations even for the most recent Mesozoic and Cenozoic geological history of our planet. Here we introduce a fluid dynamic inverse problem to constrain unknown mantle flow back in time from seismic tomographic observations of the mantle and reconstructions of past plate motions using variational data assimilation. We derive the generalized inverse of mantle convection and explore the initial condition problem in high-resolution, 3-D spherical mantle circulation models for a time period of 100 Myr, roughly comparable to half a mantle overturn. We present a synthetic modelling experiment to demonstrate that mid-Cretaceous mantle structure can be inferred accurately from fluid dynamic inverse modelling, assuming present-day mantle structure is well-known, even if an initial first guess assumption about the mid-Cretaceous mantle involved only a simple 1-D radial temperature profile. We also demonstrate that convecting present-day mantle structure back in time by reversing the time-stepping of the energy equation is insufficient to model the mantle structure of the past. The difficulty arises, because such backward convection calculations ignore thermal diffusion effects, and therefore cannot account for the generation of thermal buoyancy in boundary layers as we go back in time. Inverse mantle convection modelling should make it possible to infer a number of flow parameters from observational constraints of the mantle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据