4.1 Article

Corneal aberrations and reading

期刊

OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 159-166

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200302000-00012

关键词

corneal topography; reading; lid forces; aberrations; refractive error

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To investigate the effects of eyelid pressure on corneal shape and corneal aberrations during reading. Methods. Twenty young subjects with normal ocular health were recruited for the study. The experiment was conducted early in the morning, with subjects instructed not to perform any prolonged reading before the experiment. Corneal topography of one eye was measured with a videokeratoscope before reading and then again after a 60-min reading task. The natural position of the eyelids was photographed in primary gaze and during the reading task. Results. Twelve of the 20 corneas showed significant changes in central topography immediately after reading. The location of the changes corresponded closely to the position and angle of the subject's eyelids during reading. The change in shape was best described as a wave-like distortion that significantly altered some corneal wavefront Zernike coefficients. There was a significant correlation between the changes in primary vertical coma and trefoil (along 30degrees). Within the central 6 mm of the cornea, there were significant changes in the root mean square error, overall refractive power, and astigmatism. Conclusions. The changes we observed in corneal topography appear to be directly related to the force exerted by the eyelids during reading. Because the cornea is the major light-refracting surface of the eye, the optical characteristics of some eyes can be significantly changed during reading by the force of the eyelids. These findings may have important implications for the definition of refractive status and may also aid in the understanding of the relationship between reading and the development of refractive errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据