4.5 Article

Incidence and risk factors for a second hip fracture in elderly women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures

期刊

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 130-136

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-002-1327-6

关键词

estrogen; osteoporosis; risk factors; second hip fracture

资金

  1. NIADDK NIH HHS [1 R01-AM35584] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [1 R01-AR35582, 1 R01-AR35583] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [5 R01-AG05394, 1 R01 AG-05407] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Women with hip fracture have an increased risk of second hip fracture but other risk factors for a second hip fracture have not been established. We sought to determine the incidence and risk factors for second hip fracture, in a prospective cohort study of community-dwelling postmenopausal women over 65 years: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. From a cohort of 9,704 women, 632 women with a documented first hip fracture during the study were followed up until a second hip fracture or the end of follow-up. Clinical risk factors and bone mineral density were assessed at the beginning of the study. Fifty-three second hip fractures were validated by radiographs. Women with hip fracture had a 2.3% per year risk of second hip fracture. Women who walked for exercise at baseline were less likely to sustain a second hip fracture with a relative risk (RR) of 0.5 [0.3-0.9], as were those who had normal depth perception (RR=0.5 [0.3-0.9]). Women who lost weight since age 25 years had an increased risk of second incident hip fracture (RR = 2.7 [1.6-4.6]), as did those who had a low calcaneal bone mineral density (RR=1.5 [1.1-2.0] per standard deviation decrease in bone mineral density). Current use of estrogen replacement therapy at baseline was protective (RR=0.5 [0.3-0.9]) up to 2 years of follow-up. We conclude that community-dwelling women with a first hip fracture have a high risk of second hip fracture, and risk factors for this second fracture are similar to those of first hip fracture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据