4.6 Article

MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cell homo- and heterotypic adhesion under flow conditions is mediated in part by Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen-galectin-3 interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 6, 页码 4127-4134

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M209590200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA86290-01, 1R43CA72284, 1R01CA89827-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [1R01AI35796] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen (T antigen)-galectin-3 interactions in adhesion of human breast carcinoma cells to the endothelium under conditions of flow was studied. Highly metastatic cells (MDA-MB-435) expressing high levels of both galectin-3 and T antigen demonstrated significantly increased adhesion to monolayers of endothelial cells compared with their non-metastatic counterpart (MDA-MB-468) in vitro. Within minutes of adhesion, the highly metastatic cells acquire the ability of enhanced homotypic adhesion, leading to the formation of multicellular aggregates at sites of attachment to endothelial cells in vitro. Treatment of cells with lactulosyl-L-leucine, a synthetic T antigen antagonist that targets galectin-3 by mimicking T antigen, caused a 60-80% inhibition of both homo- and heterotypic adhesion of MDA-MB-435 cells. Confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis revealed redistribution of endothelial galectin-3 to the site of heterotypic intercellular contacts, whereas galectin-3 in MDA-MB-435 cells accumulated at sites of homotypic interaction. MDA-MB-435 cells also exhibited increased adhesion and intravascular retention within the microvessels of transplanted lung allografts in nude mice. T antigen and galectin-3-mediated interactions of metastatic cancer cells with endothelium under conditions of flow are characterized by a unique adhesion mechanism that qualitatively distinguishes their homo-and heterotypic adhesive behavior from other cell types such as leukocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据