4.7 Article

Near-infrared imaging and the K-z relation for radio galaxies in the 7C Redshift Survey

期刊

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06172.x

关键词

galaxies : active; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; radio continuum : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present K -band imaging of all 49 radio galaxies in the 7C-I and 7C-II regions of the 7C Redshift Survey (7CRS). The low-frequency (151-MHz) selected 7CRS sample contains all sources with flux densities S (151) > 0.5 Jy in three regions of the sky. We combine the K -band magnitudes of the 7CRS radio galaxies with those from the 3CRR, 6CE and 6C(*) samples to investigate the nature of the relationship between K -magnitude and redshift and whether there is any dependence upon radio luminosity. We find that radio galaxies appear to belong to a homogeneous population that formed the bulk of their stars at high redshifts (z (f) > 5) and evolved passively from then until they reach a mean present-day luminosity of 3 L (*). We find a significant difference between the K -magnitudes of the 7CRS and 3CRR radio galaxies with the 7CRS galaxies being approximate to0.55 mag fainter at all redshifts. The cause of this weak correlation between stellar and radio luminosities probably lies in mutual correlations of these properties with the central black hole mass. We compare the evolution-corrected host luminosities at a constant radio luminosity and find that the typical host luminosity (mass) increases by approximately 1 L (*) from z similar to 2 to similar to0.5 which, although a much smaller factor than predicted by semi-analytic models of galaxy formation, is in line with results on optically selected quasars. Our study has therefore revealed that the small dispersion in stellar luminosity of radio galaxies around 3 L-* includes subtle but significant differences between the host galaxies of extreme- and moderate-power radio sources at fixed redshift, and between those of high- and low-redshift radio sources at fixed radio luminosity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据