4.4 Article

Effects of interleukin-2 therapy combined with highly active antiretroviral therapy on immune restoration in HIV-1 infection: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

AIDS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 343-351

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200302140-00008

关键词

interleukin-2; highly active antiretroviral therapy; immune restoration; CD4 cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Intermittent interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy leads to a sustained increase of CD4 T cells in HIV-1-infected patients. Methods: Symptom-free HIV-1-infected patients who were naive to all antiretroviral drugs (n = 68) and/or to protease inhibitors (n = 50) and had a CD4 cell count of 200-550 X 10(6) cells/l were randomly assigned to start lamivudine/stavudine/indinavir alone (controls) or combined from week 4 with subcutaneous IL-2 (5 X 10(6) IU twice daily for 5 days: every 4 weeks for three cycles, then every 8 weeks for seven cycles). Immunological and virological results were monitored until week 74. Results: CD4 T cell counts increased more in the IL-2 group than in the controls (median increases 865 and 262 X 10(6) cells/l, respectively; P < 0.0001); an 80% increase in CD4 T cells was achieving by 89% of the IL-2 group and by 47% of the controls (P < 0.0001). Decrease of plasma viral loads was similar in both groups. Compared with controls, IL-2 induced a greater increase of naive and memory CD4 T cells, lymphocyte expression of CD28 and CD25 (P < 0.0001) and natural killer cells (P < 0.001). In a logistic regression analysis, odds of being responders to recall antigens in vitro was 8.5-fold higher in IL-2 recipients (P = 0.002) than in controls. The former experienced a higher level of antibody response to tetanus vaccination at week 64 than controls (32 and 8 haemagglutinating units/ml, respectively; P = 0.01). Conclusions: The combination of antiviral drugs and IL-2 induced a greater expansion and function of CD4 T cells than antiretroviral drugs alone. (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据