4.8 Article

Temperature dependence of the characteristic travel distance

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 766-771

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es025717w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of temperature variation on the environmental fate of organic chemicals can be evaluated in steady-state multimedia box models by expressing chemical partitioning data and reaction rate coefficients as functions of temperature. Using such a model the temperature dependence of the characteristic travel distance in air L-A, which is a measure for the atmospheric long-range transport potential of organic chemicals, is calculated. Simulations are reported for a set of 40 chemicals of environmental interest. Increasing temperature is shown to have two opposing effects on LA. Rates of chemical transformations in the atmosphere (k(air)) and surface media are increased, which reduces L-A. Rates of atmospheric deposition (k(dep)) are reduced leading to increased mobility and L-A. Accordingly, L-A can monotonically increase or decrease with increasing temperature, or it can have a maximum in the modeled temperature range, but it cannot have a minimum. For chemicals with a strong temperature dependence of k(air) relative to k(dep), L-A Will increase with increasing temperature. Results for selected polychlorinated biphenyls are compared to monitoring data yielding qualitative agreement when chemical properties are adjusted to mean temperatures for the measurement period. The results demonstrate that the temperature dependence of the characteristic travel distance is highly dependent on chemical characteristics and can be counterintuitive. The use of mass balance models is thus essential. The difference between the L-A values at 5 degreesC and 30 degreesC can be up to a factor of 6. Accordingly, chemical ranking with respect to L-A can change significantly if performed at different temperatures. Implications of the different temperature dependencies on long-range transport to polar regions are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据