4.7 Article

Neurotrophin-3 expressed in situ induces axonal plasticity in the adult injured spinal cord

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 1424-1431

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01424.2003

关键词

neurotrophin-3; axonal plasticity; adenoviral vectors; spinal cord injury; regeneration; NT-3

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35280] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mammalian CNS lacks the ability to effectively compensate for injury by the regeneration of damaged axons or axonal plasticity of intact axons. However, reports suggest that molecular or cellular manipulations can induce compensatory processes that could support regeneration or plasticity after trauma. We tested whether local, sustained release of the neurotrophic factor neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) would support axonal plasticity in the spinal cord distal to the site of injury in rats. The corticospinal tract (CST) was cut unilaterally at the level of the medulla. This avoided excessive inflammation, secondary cell death, vascular disruption, and the release of inhibitory molecules in the lumbar spinal cord. A replication-defective adenoviral vector (Adv) carrying the NT-3 gene (Adv. EFalpha-NT3) was delivered to the spinal motoneurons by retrograde transport through the sciatic nerve. Retrograde transport of the adenoviral vectors avoided the inflammatory response that would be associated with direct injection into the spinal cord. Transduction of spinal motoneurons with Adv. EFalpha-NT3 resulted in a significant increase in the concentration of NT-3 in the L3-L6 region of the spinal cord for up to 3 weeks. In animals with a CST lesion, this local expression of NT-3 induced growth of axons from the intact CST across the midline to the denervated side. If the CST remained intact, overexpression of NT-3 did not lead to an increase in the number of axons crossing the midline. These data demonstrate that local, sustained expression of NT-3 will support axonal plasticity of intact CST axons after trauma-induced denervation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据