4.4 Article

Intramolecular proton-transfer reactions in a membrane-bound proton pump:: The effect of pH on the peroxy to ferryl transition in cytochrome c oxidase

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 1488-1498

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi026524o

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the membrane-bound redox-driven proton pump cytochrome c oxidase, electron- and proton-transfer reactions must be coupled, which requires controlled modulation of the kinetic and/or thermodynamic properties of proton-transfer reactions through the membrane-spanning part of the protein. In this study we have investigated proton-transfer reactions through a pathway that is used for the transfer of both substrate and pumped protons in cytochrome c oxidase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Specifically, we focus on the formation of the so-called F intermediate, which is rate limited by an internal proton-transfer reaction from a possible branching point in the pathway, at a glutamic-acid residue (E(I-286)), to the binuclear center. We have also studied the reprotonation of E(I-286) from the bulk solution. Evaluation of the data in terms of a model presented in this work gives a rate of internal proton transfer from E(I-286) to the proton acceptor at the catalytic site of 1.1 . 10(4) s(-1). The apparent pK(a) of the donor (E(I-286)), determined from the pH dependence of the F-formation kinetics, was found to be 9.4, while the pKa of the proton acceptor at the catalytic site is likely to be greater than or equal to2.5 pH units higher. In the pH range up to pH 10 the proton equilibrium between the bulk solution and E(I-286) was much faster than 10(4)s(-1), while in the pH range above pH 10 the proton uptake from solution is rate limiting for the overall reaction. The apparent second-order rate constant for proton transfer from the bulk solution to E(I-286) is > 10(13) M-1 s(-1), which indicates that the proton uptake is assisted by a local buffer consisting of protonatable residues at the protein surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据