4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Risk assessment dosimetry model for inhaled particulate matter: I. Human subjects

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 138, 期 1-2, 页码 119-132

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00411-3

关键词

inhaled PM; PM dosimetry; risk assessment model; human simulations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pollutant particulate matter (PM) is a serious global problem, presenting a threat to the health and well being of human subjects. Inhalation exposures tests with surrogate animals can be performed to estimate the threat. However, it is difficult to extrapolate the findings of animal tests to human conditions. In this two-part series, interspecies dosimetry models especially designed for implementation with risk assessment protocols are presented. In Part I, the mathematical integrity of the source model per se was tested with data from human subjects, and theoretical predictions agreed well with experimental measurements. In Part II, for surrogate (rat) simulations, appropriate algorithms for morphologies and ventilatory parameters were used as subroutines in the validated model. We conducted a comprehensive series of computer simulations describing the behavior of a representative air pollutant, secondary cigarette smoke. For risk assessment interests, a range of states from rest to exercise was considered. PM hygroscopicity had a pronounced effect on deposition in a complex but systematic manner, in humans and rats: deposition was increased for particles larger than about 1 mum, but was decreased for particles smaller than about 0. 1 mum. The results clearly indicate that dosimetry models can be effectively used to a priori determine the laboratory conditions necessary for animals tests to accurately mimic human conditions. Moreover, the use of interspecies models is very cost effective. We propose, therefore, that mathematical models be used in a complementary manner with inhalation exposure experiments and be actively integrated into PM risk assessment protocols. Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据