4.7 Article

2,3-dimethoxybenzo[i]phenanthridines:: Topoisomerase I-targeting anticancer agents

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 521-528

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00530-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA077433, CA39662] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [P41RR0954] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Appropriately substituted benzo[i]phenanthridines structurally related to nitidine, a benzo[c]phenanthridine alkaloid with antitumor activity, are active as topoisomerase 1-targeting agents. Studies on benzo[i]phenanthridines have indicated analogues that possess a 2,3-methylenedioxy moiety and at least one and preferably two methoxyl groups at the 8- and 9-positions, such as 8,9-dimethoxy-2,3-methylenedioxybenzo[i]phenanthridine, 2, are active as topoisomerase 1-targeting agents. Tetramethoxylated benzo[i]phenanthridines, wherein the 2,3-methylenedioxy moiety is replaced with methoxyl groups at the 2- and 3-position, are inactive as a topoisomerase 1-targeting agent. These results initially suggested that the 2,3-methylenedioxy moiety was critical to the retention of potent activity. Further studies revealed that 2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxybenzo[i]phenanthridine, 7a, is more potent than 2 as a topoisomerase 1-targeting agent. The observation that 2,3-dimethoxylated benzo[i]phenanthridines can actually exhibit enhanced activity prompted the present study in which several 8-substituted 2,3-dimethoxybenzo[i]phenanthridines were prepared and their pharmacological activities evaluated. The influence of NH2, CN, CH2OH, OBn, OCH3, OH, and NHCOCH3 substituents at the 8-position on the relative activity of these 2,3 -dimethoxybenzo[i]phenanthridines was examined. Relative to these derivatives, 7a was the most potent topoisomerase I-targeting agent, possessing similar cytotoxicity to that of nitidine in the human lymphoblast tumor cell line, RPMI8402. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据