4.7 Article

Effects of phenolic acids on human phenolsulfotransferases in relation to their antioxidant activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 1474-1479

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf0208132

关键词

platelet; human phenolsulfotransferases; phenolic acids; antioxidant activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfate conjugation by phenolsulfotransferase (PST) enzyme is an important process in the detoxification of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds. There are two forms of PST that are specific for the sulfation of small phenols (PST-P) and monoamines (PST-M). Phenoilc acids have been reported to have important biological and pharmacological properties and may have benefits to human health. In the present study, human platelets were used as a model to investigate the influence of 13 phenolic acids on human PST activity and to evaluate the relationship to their antioxidant activity. The results showed that chlorogenic acid, syringic acid, protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, sinapic acid, and caffeic acid significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited the activities of both forms of PST by 21-30% at a concentration of 6.7 muM. The activity of PST-P was enhanced (p < 0.05) by P-hydroxybenzoic acid, gallic acid, gentisic acid, o-coumaric acid, p-coumaric acid, and m-coumaric acid at a concentration of 6.7 muM, whereas the activity of PST-M was enhanced by gentisic acid, gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and ferulic acid. The phenolic acids exhibited antioxidant activity as determined by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay, especially gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, gentisic acid, and coumaric acid, which had strong activity. The overall effect of phenolic acids tested on the activity of PST-P and PST-M was well correlated to their antioxidant activity of ORAC value (r = 0.71, p < 0.01; and r = 0.66, p < 0.01). These observations suggest that antioxidant phenolic acids might alter sulfate conjugation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据