4.2 Article

Dehydration dynamics of epistilbite by in situ time resolved synchrotron powder diffraction

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MINERALOGY
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 257-266

出版社

E SCHWEIZERBARTSCHE VERLAGS
DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2003/0015-0257

关键词

in situ powder diffraction; X-ray synchrotron radiation; zeolite dehydration; epistilbite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The step by step thermal dehydration process of the zeolite epistilbite from Osilo (Sardinia, Italy), (Ba0.01Sr0.03K0.08Na1.04Ca2.29)[Al5.80Si18.20O48].15.8H(2)O, has been studied in situ by synchrotron radiation powder diffraction. The time-resolved experiment was performed using a translating imaging plate system. Rietveld refinements, based on the average C2/m epistilbite structure, were carried out on 26 consecutive powder patterns in the temperature range from 323 K to 791 K, the upper stability limit of epistilbite in our experiment. Three dehydration steps occur at about 370 K, 470 K and 573 K. The first step is mainly related to the loss of the H2O molecules in the W3 site not directly coordinated to extraframework cations ('only hydrogen bonded' water). In the intermediate region between step (a) and (b) epistilbite retains only about 14 water molecules, corresponding to those coordinated to Ca (and Na) ions. Gradual W3, W2, and W1 water losses in step (b) reduce the residual water to about 9 H2O molecules, which is retained up to step (c). This is the minimum water content to maintain the six-coordination of Ca2+ ions. Further water expulsion leads to a first-order phase transition to a collapsed structure (epistilbite B), which has been refined in the C2/m space group. The deformation pattern of the T-O-T angles and the re-arrangement of the extraframework Ca (and Na) cations in epistilbite B suggest a remarkable control exerted by the Si, Al ordering on the thermal stability of epistilbite, whose structural breakdown occurs at very low temperature compared to the related mordenite and ferrierite structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据