4.4 Article

Nucleotide sequence and infectious transcripts from a full-length cDNA clone of the carmovirus Melon necrotic spot virus

期刊

ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
卷 148, 期 3, 页码 599-607

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-002-0927-y

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have studied the biological and molecular characteristics of a MNSV isolate collected in Spain (MNSV-Maalpha) and generated a full-length cDNA clone from which infectious RNA transcripts can be produced. The host range of MNSV May appeared to be limited to cucurbits and did not differ from that of MNSV Dutch [4, 21]. However, differences were observed in the type of symptoms that both isolates could induce. A full-length cDNA of MNSV-Maalpha was directly amplified by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) using a 5'-end primer anchoring a T7 RNA promoter sequence and a 3'-end primer, and cloned. Uncapped RNAs transcribed from this cDNA clone were infectious and caused symptoms indistinguishable from those caused by viral RNA when mechanically inoculated onto melon, cucumber or watermelon plants. The complete genome sequence of MNSV-Malpha5 was deduced from the full length cDNA clone. It is 4271 nt long and, similarly to MNSV-Dutch, consists of 5' and 3' untranslated regions(UTRs) and five open reading frames (ORFs) coding for 29, 89,42 and two small 7 kDa proteins. One notable difference between MNSV-Maalpha and other sequenced MNSV isolates was found, as for MNSV May the first of the two small ORFs, which are contiguous in the genome, terminates with a genuine stop codon, whereas for MNSV-Dutch and other sequenced MNSV isolates it terminates with an amber codon. This suggested that the putative p14 readthrough protein that could be expressed from the MNSV-Dutch and other MNSV genomes could not be expressed from the MNSV-Maalpha genome. Also, the nucleotide and amino acid sequences comparisons showed a distant relationship of MNSV-Maalpha with other known MNSV isolates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据