4.6 Article

Sensory and biomechanical responses to ramp-controlled distension of the human duodenum

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00456.2001

关键词

cross-sectional area; distensibility; duodenum; pain; length-tension relationship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to develop a new method for investigation of the relationship among the mechanical stimulus, the biomechanical properties, and the visceral perception evoked by volume/ramp-controlled distension in the human duodenum in vivo. An impedance planimetric probe for balloon distension was placed in the third part of the duodenum in seven healthy volunteers. Distension of the duodenum was done at infusion rates of 10, 25, and 50 ml/min. The pump was reversed when level 7 was reached on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10. Distensions were done with and without the administration of the antimuscarinic drug butylscopolamine. The total circumferential tension (T-total) and the passive circumferential tension (T-passive) were determined from the distension tests without and with the administration of butylscopolamine, respectively. Ttotal and Tpassive showed an exponential behavior as a function of strain (a measure of deformation). The active circumferential tension (T-active) was computed as T-total-T-passive and showed a bell-shaped behavior as a function of strain. At low distension intensities, the intensity of sensation at 10 ml/min was significantly higher than that obtained at 25 and 50 ml/min. The coefficient of variation at the pain threshold for circumferential strain (average 4.34) was closer to zero compared with those for volume (8.72), pressure (31.22), and circumferential tension (31.55). This suggests that the mechanoreceptors in the gastrointestinal wall depend primarily on circumferential strain. The stimulus-response functions provided evidence for the existence of low- and high-threshold mechanoreceptors in the human duodenum. Furthermore, the data suggest that high-threshold receptors are nonadapting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据