4.6 Article

Recent role of Hassab's operation for cirrhotic patients: Combination with endoscopic procedure for varices

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 57-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.04.024

关键词

gastroesophageal varices; liver cirrhosis; splenectomy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objective: Recently, endoscopic and radiological procedures for various symptoms related to cirrhosis have improved. Thus, the role of Hassab's operation (gastroesophageal decongestion and splenectomy) has changed for cirrhotic patients. Methods: Hassab's operation was performed on patients who had gastroesophageal varices that were difficult to control with balloon occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration or an endoscopic procedure, or had hypersplenism. Thirteen consecutive patients underwent this operation, and the outcomes of all patients were reviewed retrospectively. Results: There was no operative morbidity or rebleeding varices. In the preoperative endoscopic injection sclerotherapy treated group (n = 6), only one patient (16.7%) developed recurrent varices. Mean platelet counts were significantly higher 6 months after surgery (201 +/- 65 x 10(3)/mm(3)) than preoperatively (64 +/- 54 x 10(3)/mm(3)). In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, percutaneous therapies, such as radio frequency ablation, were safely performed with adequate therapeutic effect. Interferon therapy was given to patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis without interruption. Conclusion: Hassab's operation is a satisfactory approach to controlling varices, especially when combined with preoperative endoscopic treatment. Platelet counts were significantly higher after surgery. This therapy was important for cirrhotic patients contraindicated for liver transplantation in that they could continue their therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HCV as needed. Copyright (C) 2012, Asian Surgical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据