4.5 Article

A fluorescence-based, high-performance liquid chromatographic assay to determine acid sphingomyelinase activity and diagnose types A and B Niemann-Pick disease

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 314, 期 1, 页码 116-120

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00629-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD 28607] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acid sphingomyelinase (ASM; sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, EC 3.1.4.12) is the lysosomal enzyme that hydrolyzes sphingomyelin (SPM) to phosphorylcholine and ceramide. An inherited deficiency of ASM activity results in Types A and B Niemann-Pick disease (NPD). In this study we report a new assay method to detect ASM activity and diagnose NPD using the fluorescent substrate BODIPY C12-SPM and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The reaction product, BODIPY C12-ceramide (B12Cer), could be clearly and efficiently separated from the substrate within 4 min using a reverse-phase column (Aquasil C18, Keystone Scientific). Femtomole quantities of B12Cer could be detected in as little as 1.0 mul of human plasma, providing a sensitive measure of ASM activity. The mean ASM activity in human plasma from NPD patients (36 pmol/ml/h) was only 2.7% of that in normal plasma (1334 pmol/ml/h), confirming the specificity and diagnostic value of this new assay method. Importantly, the mean ASM activity in human plasma from NPD carriers (258.3 pmol/ml/h) also was significantly reduced (19.5% of normal). The ranges of ASM plasma activities in NPD patients (N = 19), NPD carriers (N = 11), and normal subjects (N = 15) were 2.5-97.3, 108-551, and 1030-2124 pmol/ml/h, respectively. Based on these results, we suggest that this fluorescence-based HPLC assay method is a reliable, rapid, and highly sensitive technique to determine ASM activity and that plasma is a very reliable and simple source for the accurate diagnosis of NPD patients and carriers based on ASM activity. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据