4.7 Article

Weak gravitational lensing: reducing the contamination by intrinsic alignments

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06213.x

关键词

cosmology : observations; gravitational lensing; galaxies : formation; large-scale structure of Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrinsic alignments of galaxies can mimic to an extent the effects of shear caused by weak gravitational lensing. Previous studies have shown that for shallow surveys with median redshifts z (m) similar to 0.1, the intrinsic alignment dominates the lensing signal. For deep surveys with z (m) similar to 1, intrinsic alignments are believed to be a significant contaminant of the lensing signal, preventing high-precision measurements of the matter power spectrum. In this paper we show how distance information, either spectroscopic or photometric redshifts, can be used to downweight nearby pairs in an optimized way, to reduce the errors in the shear signal arising from intrinsic alignments. Provided a conservatively large intrinsic alignment is assumed, the optimized weights will essentially remove all traces of contamination. For the Sloan spectroscopic galaxy sample, residual shot noise continues to render it unsuitable for weak lensing studies. However, a dramatic improvement for the slightly deeper Sloan photometric survey is found, whereby the intrinsic contribution, at angular scales greater than 1 arcmin, is reduced from about 80 times the lensing signal to a 10 per cent effect. For deeper surveys such as the COMBO-17 survey with z (m) similar to 0.6, the optimization reduces the error from a largely systematic similar to220 per cent error at small angular scales to a much smaller and largely statistical error of only 17 per cent of the expected lensing signal. We therefore propose that future weak lensing surveys be accompanied by the acquisition of photometric redshifts, in order to remove fully the unknown intrinsic alignment errors from weak lensing detections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据