4.3 Review

Functions and regulation of β-1,3-glucanases during seed germination, dormancy release and after-ripening

期刊

SEED SCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 17-34

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1079/SSR2002121

关键词

abscisic acid; after-ripening; gibberellin; beta-1,3-glucanase; Nicotiana seeds; seed dormancy; seed germination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-1,3-Glucanase (betaGlu) expression in seeds plays important roles in the regulation of seed germination, dormancy and in the defence against seed pathogens. A thick beta-1,3-glucan layer is typical for the seed envelope of cucurbitaceous species, confers seed semipermeability and is degraded during germination. In many species with coat-imposed dormancy, the seed envelope confers a physical constraint to radicle emergence. In the solanaceous species, the micropylar endosperm and testa have this function, and endosperm weakening appears to be a prerequisite for germination. Class I betaGlu is transcriptionally induced in the micropylar endosperm of tobacco, tomato and other solanaceous seeds just prior to radicle emergence. betaGlu induction and germination are tightly linked in response to plant hormones and environmental factors, e.g. they are both promoted by gibberellins and inhibited by abscisic acid (ABA). Sense and antisense transformation of tobacco reveals two sites of betaGlu action: after-ripening-mediated release of testa-imposed dormancy and endosperm rupture during germination. The use of an ABA-inducible chimeric sense-transgene resulted in overexpression of class I betaGlu in seeds and provided direct evidence that betaGlu contributes to endosperm rupture. A model integrating betaGlu, seed dormancy, after-ripening and germination is presented, and possible mechanisms for betaGlu action are discussed. It is proposed that betaGlu not only helps defend seeds against pathogens, but is also a key factor in regulating coat-imposed dormancy and germination of seeds in response to environmental and hormonal cues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据