4.4 Article

Focal adhesion kinase as a marker of malignant phenotype in breast and cervical carcinomas

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 240-245

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2003.40

关键词

focal adhesion kinase; ductal carcinoma of the breast; squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix; malignant transformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrins mediate cell adhesion to extracellular matrix and stimulate signals involved in cell proliferation, survival, and migration. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is considered the central molecule in integrin-mediated signaling. Previously, FAK has been implicated in invasive tumor behavior based on Northern or Western blot (immunoblot) using total tumor tissue homogenates. We used immunohistochemistry to demonstrate FAK expression in benign cervical epithelium, dysplasia, carcinoma in situ (CIS), and invasive cervical squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), as well as in benign breast tissue, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinomas of the breast. We also used polymerase chain reaction to analyze whether infection with the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes correlated with FAK overexpression in CIS of the cervix. We found minimal FAK expression in benign cervical and breast epithelium and in low-grade squamous dysplasia (CIN I and CIN I-II) of the cervix, and variable FAK expression in CIS lesions of the cervix (10 of 14 cases). Most of the invasive SCCs of the cervix (13 of 16 cases) and DCIS of the breast (6 of 8 cases) were positive for FAK Surprisingly, all DCIS of the breast were also strongly positive (7 of 7). Only 3 of 13 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were focally positive for FAK Regardless of the intensity of FAK staining, all CIS of the cervix were positive for either HPV 16 or 18. We conclude that FAK overexpression is not restricted to invasive phenotype, but rather appears to be a marker for malignant transformation. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据