4.7 Article

Effects of protein kinase C inhibition and activation on proliferation and apoptosis of bovine retinal pericytes

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 416-419

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-003-1044-5

关键词

diabetic retinopathy; pericytes; glucose; protein kinase C; cell replication; cell cycle; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis. Drop-out of capillary pericytes occurs early and selectively in diabetic retinopathy. High glucose concentrations decrease replication and increase apoptosis of cultured pericytes. Since glucose activates protein kinase C, we investigated the effects of modulating this intracellular mediator on replication, cell cycle and apoptosis of cultured bovine retinal pericytes. Methods. Pericytes cultured in 5.6 or 28 mmol/l glucose were exposed to a protein kinase C activator (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate) and/or a selective inhibitor of its beta(2) isoform (LY379196). Cells were counted after 7 days. Proliferation by the tetrazolium to formazan assay and DNA synthesis by 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation were measured at day 4. Cell cycle by flow cytometry and apoptosis by ELISA were assessed at day 2. Results. High glucose reduced pericyte replication and increased apoptosis. Protein kinase C activation increased proliferation, while inhibition of its beta2 isoform decreased it. Cell cycle was accelerated by protein kinase C activation and delayed by inhibition. Apoptosis was enhanced by protein kinase C inhibition and reduced by activation. Conclusions/interpretation. Protein kinase C inhibition amplifies the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of high glucose on cultured pericytes, whereas stimulation reduces apoptosis and promotes proliferation both in physiological glucose and high glucose. Protein kinase C inhibition, proposed for the treatment of diabetic macular. edema and proliferative retinopathy, might accelerate pericyte dropout in earlier stages when these cells are still present in retinal capillaries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据