4.3 Article

Learning associated increase in heat shock cognate 70 mRNA and protein expression

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 142-151

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7427(02)00008-4

关键词

heat shock protein; heat shock cognate 70 (HSC70); learning and memory; spatial learning; gene expression; stress; Morris water maze; hippocampus formation

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 13646-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Morris water maze is a task widely used to investigate cellular and molecular changes associated with spatial learning and memory. This task has both spatial and aversive (swimming related stress) components. It is possible that stress may influence cellular modifications observed after learning the Morris water maze spatial task. Heat shock proteins, also known as stress proteins, are up-regulated in response to thermal stress, trauma, or environmental insults. In the rat hippocampus, psychophysiological stress increases the levels of heat shock protein 70 (HSC70). In this study, we investigated whether the expression of the Im-70 gene is modulated in the hippocampus during learning of the Morris water maze task. Five groups of rats were trained in the Morris water maze task for varying amounts of time (either 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 days). Training consisted of 10 trials/day in which the animals were given 60 s to find a submerged platform. Rats were sacrificed 24 In after their last training trial. Results showed a significant increase in hsc70 mRNA and protein levels in the hippocampal formation after two and three days of training, respectively. The increase in mRNA and protein was associated with learning but not stress because the increase was not observed in the yoked control animals. These findings suggest that cellular and molecular changes can occur independent of stress. Moreover, the results are the first to implicate hsc70 expression in spatial learning. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据